DO. DollOrigin

中文 EN 日本語

Back to the archive

FeePle65 Carol (Antique Rose)

Stable id fairyland-feeple65-carol-antique-rose

Original name
FeePle65 Carol (Antique Rose)
Chinese title
FeePle65 Carol (Antique Rose) No translation recorded; the original name is shown.
English title
FeePle65 Carol (Antique Rose)
Japanese title
FeePle65 Carol (Antique Rose) No translation recorded; the original name is shown.
Designer
Not recorded
Brand
CP/FairyLand
Type
Complete doll
Debut
Not recorded
Production status
Not recorded

Summary

Facts below are from the official product page (checked 2026-10-27). Listed type: (New Release)FeePle65 Female. Skin colours offered: Natural / Beautiful White / Tan. Production time as stated: 90 days (99 days for Tan Skin option). Credits: Sculptor: G.O(Cerberus Project); Face Sculptor: hae(Cerberus Project); Costume: Sunny Day(Park YounSun). At the time of checking, the page showed "out of stock" (not the same as discontinued). Not available yet: height, release date.

Versions

Version Composition Model code Size Material Skin tone
FeePle65 Carol Designers Complete (Antique Rose) Other Not recorded As written: FeePle65 Not recorded Not recorded
FeePle65 Carol Full Package (Antique Rose) Other Not recorded As written: FeePle65 Not recorded Not recorded
(Extra Stock) FeePle65 Carol Designers Complete (Antique Rose) Other Not recorded As written: FeePle65 Not recorded Not recorded

Releases and dates

Not recorded

Official pages

DollOrigin does not sell dolls and does not infer stock from a release date.

FeePle65 Carol Designers Complete (Antique Rose)

Direct / official · Not recorded · Updated Not recorded

Listed price:Not recorded

See the official page for current status.

FeePle65 Carol Full Package (Antique Rose)

Direct / official · Not recorded · Updated Not recorded

Listed price:Not recorded

See the official page for current status.

Official page

Direct / official · Not recorded · Updated 2026-10-27

Listed price:Not recorded

See the official page for current status.

Something is wrong